Category Archives: SPLOST

DeKalb E-SPLOST Project List

On the May 24, 2016 ballot, the DeKalb County School District intends to bring forth a referendum for an Education Special Purpose Local Options Sales Tax (E-SPLOST) as follows.
ESPLOST
E-SPLOST
Education Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax is an additional penny sales tax levy for capital improvements for schools.  Voters can approve or deny the e-SPLOST for five year increments.  Since 1997, voters have approved referendums for, four e-SPLOSTs.
Related Docs
.pdf link icon  Abbreviated referendum – Just Dekalb’s part
.pdf link icon  Complete 15 page Referendum
History of E-SPLOST in DeKalb

Date of Vote Five Year Period % Yes % Turnout Amount
I Mar. 18, 1997 July 1997 –June 2002 68.40% 20.60% $415
II Mar. 20, 2002 July 2002 –June 2007 61.40% 9.40% $457
III Mar. 20, 2007 July2007 –June 2012 69.70% 5.40% $489
IV Nov. 8, 2011 July2012 –June 2017 62.20% 13.90% $492 (Anticipated)
V 24-May-16 July 2017 –June 2022 $500 (Anticipated)

Proposed Funding Allocation

Resolution Item $ millions Percentage
1. Safety and Security $15 3%
2. New Facilities and Additions $230 46%
3. Facility Condition Improvements $100 20%
4. Technology Improvements,incl. ERP $65 13%
5.Buses, Vehicles, and Other Capital Equipment $40 8%
Management and Contingency $50 10%
Totals $500 100%

E-SPLOST Project List
Previous E-SPLOST referendums have included a specific list of projects for voters to consider.  The current administration is taking a different approach as they ask for voter approval for E-SPLOST V.  The administration is not presenting a list of projects, but rather, is indicating the types of projects they intend to fund.  If approved, this referendum will not contain any specific commitments to the taxpayers or school communities.  Here is the proposed language for the referendum:  E-SPLOST Referendum V below.
Regional meetings to discuss potential projects will not be held until after the vote to approve or deny the e-SPLOST.  The plan is to hold meetings in September to discuss the project list. The administration is asking the board to discuss the results of those meetings in November and approve the final detailed project list in December.
Paragraph i – Improve Safety and Security
Making of site, facility and technology improvements deemed necessary to improve safety and security, such as enhancing surveillance systems, fire alarms systems, fire sprinkler installation, perimeter fencing, etc. at some or all of the DCSD Schools and Facilities;
Paragraph ii – Creating New Schools
Adding to, modifying, replacing, reconfiguring schools and/or facilities or creating new schools and/or facilities to accommodate current and future student enrollment, develop early childhood centers, enhance regional support of schools, address major facility conditions, and accommodate expanded or new programmatic needs, and acquiring land for constructing and equipping new and/or replacement schools/facilities, or equivalent facility capacity, including, but not limited to, site preparation and the demolition of all or portions of existing structures and/or acquiring leasehold purchasing of facilities/properties as needed based on DeKalb County School District’s determination of need priorities;
Paragraph iii – Renovate and Repair Existing Schools
Adding to, renovating, modifying, reconfiguring, equipping, upgrading, supplementing, acquiring, replacing, and installing capital improvements for various existing and new schools, buildings and facilities (including schools, buildings and facilities to be constructed pursuant to this resolution, once completed and including any site preparation and demolition of existing structures if necessary)–e.g., roofing, plumbing, wiring, painting, water piping, HVAC, making athletic field and physical education facility upgrades and improvements, ADA renovations, infrastructure improvements, repaving, restroom facilities, systems for environmental and air quality control, physical education facilities, kitchens, improvements to comply with health, safety and applicable building codes, traffic control and optimization, parking and parking capacity, storm water management facilities, and program-driven modifications, as needed based on the DeKalb County School District’s determination of need priorities at some or all of the [DeKalb County School District’s] schools and facilities.
Paragraph iv – Technology Improvements
Making technology improvements, by acquiring, replacing, purchasing, installing, upgrading or supplementing technology including, but not limited to: technology that supports and/or enhances instruction, digital communication technology, enhanced school security solutions, wireless technology, enterprise content management solutions, replacement and/or enhancement of technology/systems in support of an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) upgrade, data storage systems, telecommunication systems, digital records retention, technology hardware, software, and related infrastructure at some or all of DSCD Schools and Facilities, as needed;
Paragraph v – Replacing School Buses & Equipment
Replacing, purchasing, upgrading, refurbishing or supplementing school buses and support vehicles and other capital equipment as needed including, but not limited to items such as, desks, chairs, tables, instructional equipment, band equipment, kitchen equipment, waste compactors, portable classrooms/modular buildings, custodial equipment, grounds equipment, etc. at some or all of DCSD Schools and Facilities;
Related Docs
GMA Legal Report August 2012 – The Georgia Municipal Association is pleased to provide for municipal officials a discussion of legal and policy considerations relevant to the special purpose local option sales tax.
E-SPLOST Referendum V
The Georgia Attorney General’s office issued an unofficial opinion in 1990 (U90 18) that said the list of projects that appears on a SPLOST resolution need not give the voters a high level of specificity, as the statue governing SPLOST resolution does not require it .
According to the unofficial opinion, “There is no necessity that the description of the purpose or purposes for the tax be in exacting detail. Rather . . . the description and the purposes must be only so specific as to place the electorate on fair notice of the projects to which the tax will be devoted.”
Merely noting the types of projects to be funded, assuming that they are in accord with the types of projects specified by state Code, is sufficient.

Mayor Mike Davis – Austin ES Rebuild Update


Stan Jester
Board Of Education
District 1

Superintendent Green and his staff have approached the Austin rebuild situation very methodically. I asked Dr. Green and his administration to meet Dunwoody’s city representatives and work with them on a solution together.
Dunwoody Talk cracks me up.  Be sure to read Callihan’s latest take on the Austin ES rebuild.
Mayor Mike Davis sent this update on the Austin ES Rebuild this morning.

Mayor Mike Davis

Keep Austin in the Neighborhood
By: Mayor Mike Davis

The ability to walk your children to school is one of the reasons why Dunwoody is an exceptional place to live. Recent discussions have brought this issue (and others) to the forefront as the DeKalb County School District (DCSD) has been exploring the future of Austin Elementary.Walking kids to school is not the sole benefit of neighborhood schools; critical factors such as home values, quality of life and class sizes are all at stake. But keeping Austin within its immediate vicinity on Roberts Drive is obviously the leading factor for Austin families.In late September, DCSD representatives briefed Austin Council members on plans for a renovation/rebuild and a potential new location with an increased capacity to meet future growth. These plans included the possibility of locating the new facility to an undisclosed spot within a “3 mile radius” of Austin’s current home.
Upon hearing this, I decided it was time for the City of Dunwoody and in particular the mayor to have a meaningful seat at the discussion table.
I took this as a call to action and set up a meeting this past Friday with Joshua Williams, Chief Operating Officer for DCSD and Daniel Drake, Director of Planning and SPLOST Programming for DCSD. I had our senior staff and mapping people with me so we could show dynamic changes as we virtually moved the school from site to site.
Austin Elementary has a current enrollment of approximately 660 students and a maximum capacity of 616, hence the need for four portable trailers on site. After initial discussions of the current issues, we all agreed something needs to be done to address the long-term success of Austin.
Unfortunately there are challenges in front of any change. The construction of a larger school on the current site is viewed as difficult for a variety of reasons including usable acreage, high voltage power lines, high pressure petroleum pipelines, traffic patterns and playground space needs.
Contrary to neighborhood rumors, the city has never been presented with a proposal for DCSD to buy the ball fields to the south of Austin. The ball fields have deed restrictions making it difficult (but not impossible) to put a school there. This is a definite possibility and really the only option in my mind other than leaving the school on its current site.
The only green field site in Dunwoody is the field across from the MARTA station. With State Farm paying $8 million per acre across the street, that site is out of the question. Buying out a neighborhood or commercial area is too expensive also.
It’s worth noting, Mr. Williams and Mr. Drake were pleased with the ability to finally work with a city government regarding decisions affecting an almost perfect school cluster (1 high school, 1 middle school and five and a half elementary schools). In the unincorporated parts of the county it’s difficult for them to find a single person or group who actually represents an entire community’s needs and requirements.
In the end, DCSD heard us loud and clear on keeping Austin a local school. I left with the promise of returning to the discussion after DCSD has conducted its next round of legal, cost and feasibility studies to collectively determine an efficient, amenable and community-minded solution.
I went into this meeting with two primary objectives. First, keep the Austin school in the footprint of the current attendance zone, hopefully on Roberts Drive. And secondly, avoid moving the students to a temporary site for 2 years while the school is rebuilt at the current location. A major objective of the school system is to build capacity for future growth, utilization, teacher-to-student ratio and class sizes. I’m pleased with the direction our talks have taken so far.