Category Archives: Finances

DeKalb Schools 2018 and 2019 Independent Auditor’s Reports

By Anna Hill, DeKalb Schools Board of Education Elect

The 2018 and 2019 Annual Financial Report and Independent Auditor’s Reports have been issued. I am grateful that the Department of Audits and Accounts and State Auditor Greg Griffin were willing/able to audit two years at once, especially during a worldwide pandemic.

Anna Hill DeKalb Schools Board of Education
Anna Hill
DeKalb Schools
Board of Education Elect

I encourage everyone to keep in mind we have a new Superintendent who was not employed by DCSD for FY 2018, FY 2019, and FY 2020. I have been very impressed and encouraged by Ms. Watson-Harris’s commitment to DCSD and I look forward to getting to know her after I am sworn in on January 5, 2021.

As a CPA, I thought it would be helpful to share some highlights from the 2018 and 2019 audits issued October 5, 2020 and October 16, 2020, respectively.

Please remember this situation did not get this way overnight and cannot be fixed overnight so I encourage you to exercise patience as DCSD works to complete the Corrective Action committed to in the 2018 and 2019 audits (current completion date of 12/31/20.)

Audit Results: The audit opinion for both 2018 and 2019 is that the financial statements present fairly the financial operations of DCSD.

Supporting Documents
DeKalb Schools 2018 Audit Report
DeKalb Schools 2018 Audit Report

DeKalb Schools Audit Trends

The Findings and Questioned Costs (Section IV) are as follows.

2018:
* Material Weakness and Significant Deficiencies were identified related to internal control over financial reporting.
* Noncompliance material to financial statements were noted.
(Source: Section IV, Page 1-7; page 79-86 in the 2018 audit .pdf.)
DCSD concurred with the findings.

2019:
* Material Weakness and Significant Deficiencies were identified related to internal control over financial reporting.
* Noncompliance material to financial statements were not noted.
(Source: Section IV, Page 1-7; page 81-88 in the 2018 audit .pdf.)
DCSD concurred with the findings.

Each year, the auditors document the cause of the deficiencies as reported by DCSD. They do not perform audit procedures to confirm the cause of the deficiencies reported.

2018:

“In discussing this deficiency with the School District, they stated that the cause was a direct result of the lack of review of the financial statements and note disclosures as prepared by their consultant.”
(Section IV, Page 3; .pdf page 82.)

2019:

“In discussing this deficiency with the School District, they stated that the cause was a direct result of the lack of review of the financial statements and note disclosures as prepared by their consultant.”
(Section IV, Page 4; .pdf page 85)

Note: 2017 cause of deficiency was as follows:

“In discussing this deficiency with the School District, they stated that the cause was a direct result of the lack of review of the financial statements and note disclosures as prepared by their consultant.”
(Section IV, Page 3; .pdf page 76)

FAQs:

What is internal control and why does it matter?

Internal Control: Keep in mind that the purpose of the audit is not to express an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. You can google the definition of internal control, but I think this definition from Investopedia is easily understandable:

Internal controls are the mechanisms, rules, and procedures implemented by a company to ensure the integrity of financial and accounting information, promote accountability, and prevent fraud.

The AICPA (American Institute of Certified Public Accountants) explains that internal control is important because effective internal control reduces the risk of asset loss, and helps ensure that plan information is complete and accurate, financial statements are reliable, and the plan’s operations are conducted in accordance with the provisions of applicable laws and regulations.

What is a Material Weakness and Significant Deficiency in Internal Control?

Material Weakness – A material weakness is a significant error or irregularity found in a company’s financial information or internal controls. Internal controls are the rules and guidelines instituted by companies to protect their accounting information from a material weakness.

Significant Deficiency – A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, that is less severe than a material weakness yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the company’s financial reporting.

What does this all mean?

In a publicly traded company, this is a good summary from the CPA Practice Advisor website about the impact of a Material Weakness:

Material weaknesses can have damaging effects on a company’s credit rating and share price, and lead to higher audit fees and loss of investor confidence. Oftentimes, there is not one simple cause for the material weakness, but rather an aggregation of control deficiencies that could yield a material misstatement in the financial statements. As a result, public companies strive to prevent such deficiencies in internal control.

https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/accounting-audit/news/21093512/five-common-scenarios-that-can-lead-to-a-material-weakness

Where can I read details of what led to these findings?

2018 – Section IV, pages 2-3 (.pdf pages 81-82.)
2019 – Section IV, pages 2-3 (.pdf pages 83-84.)

AP Exams – Return on Investment

On Monday, the School District Administration will be asking the DeKalb Board of Education to approve $425,000 to purchase one AP exam for all students currently enrolled in an Advanced Placement Course.

The Georgia Department of Education (GaDOE) will pay for one Advanced Placement exam for students who qualify for the Free and Reduced Lunch program. Additionally, the GaDOE will cover the cost of one Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) focused Advanced Placement exam for all non-free and reduced lunch students.

Return on Investment
The school district has paid for these additional AP exams for many years. Is this money well spent? What results are we seeing? Unfortunately, less than 10% of the students in half our high schools score high enough on these AP exams to receive college credit. Given this, combined with the fact that many DeKalb students will already get 2 free exams provided by the state, is this the best use of $425,000? Could this money be used in another way that improved educational outcomes and produced a higher return on investment?

AP EXAM SCORE TRENDS

DeKalb Schools AP Exam Scores

AP EXAM SCORE DISTRIBUTION
Any score that’s 3 or higher is considered a passing score, though some colleges only accept 4s and 5s for credit. I drilled down into exam results of Towers HS and MLK Jr HS to better understand their performance. Towers has a 1% pass rate and MLK has a 4% pass rate. Here’s how that breaks down.

CLASS GRADES
Given these numbers, I was curious about the distribution of grades in these AP classes. In theory, your class performance should be a good predictor of how likely you are to pass the exams. The class average information that I was provided shows that these schools have class averages of 83% to 89%. The class averages do not seem to correlate with, or predict, success on the AP exams. It would be interesting to see the class average data for schools that have higher AP success rates. What if the grade averages are similar even though they have much higher AP success rates? What would that tell us about instruction and grading across the district? How can we use this data to drive more AP exam successes? Is the best use of resources to pay for more exams or improve instruction?

The following are the class final grade averages for each subject.


I asked DeKalb Schools Chief Academic Officer, Stacy Stepney, and the DeKalb Schools Interim Associate Superitendent of Accountability, Dr. Linda Frazer, to explain the rationale for this expense.

Question: The school district is asking for over $400K for Advanced Placement exams. Almost half the schools had less than a 10% pass rate. Is this the best use of our money? Wouldn’t that money be better spent on remediation?

Answer: According the 2014-2019 Strategic Plan, the District’s strategic goal area 1 is “Student Success with Equity and Access”. (See the attached 2018-2019 Strategic Plan Profile.) One of the identified performance objectives is to provide equitable access to academically rigorous courses and programs. As a result, the District considered the baseline data in 2013-2014 to identify targets for 2014-2019. The District has implemented several initiatives and developed performance measures to address equity and access. The performance measures included:

• Increase the percentage of graduates earning high school credits for accelerated enrollment via ACCEL, Dual HOPE Grant, Move On When Ready, Early College, Gateway to College, Advanced Placement courses, or International Baccalaureate courses
• Increase the number of males of color taking advanced courses (i.e. Honors, AP, and IB)
• Increase the number of females of color taking advanced courses (i.e. Honors, AP, and IB)
• Increase the percentage of students scoring 3 or higher on the Advanced Placement exam

The most important predictor of college success is an academically rigorous high school experience. AP, IB, and dual enrollment provide students access to academically rigorous coursework; therefore, the District is requesting to purchase one AP exam for all students.

Question: If the experience of taking advanced placement exams is extremely valuable, couldn’t we do mock examinations much cheaper?

Response: CollegeBoard has released questions, so teachers may create free, mock exams to prepare for the AP examinations in May. Mock exams will not afford students the opportunity to exempt equivalent college-level courses if they earn 3 or higher.