Category Archives: Austin Elementary School

Austin Elementary Construction Update

Cynthia Brictson and Michael Thurmond were on hand at the Austin Elementary School Council meeting Wednesday where John Jambro, Director of Design & Construction, delivered an Austin Replacement School Update.
Two things are perfectly clear;  1)  The school district does not know what to do with the students during the rebuild.  2)  The community would like a school with a capacity of 750 students and not a prototypical school with 900 students.
To that end, the district is currently performing a feasibility study to determine if renovation is a viable option.  The output of the feasibility study will include

  • Renovation and addition cost model
  • Conceptual building plan
  • Determination of a suitable location for a possible facility expansion

Austin ES Replacement/Renovation Timeline

Identify Swing Space Ongoing
Solicit Design Professional Mar- June 2015
(New) Feasibility Study Mar – April 2015
Planning / Design June 2015 – April 2016
Decommission and Vacate Austin ES May 2016
(Last day of classes)
Move to Swing Space Location May 2016 – June 2016
(Aug ’16 School Year Start)
Demolition and Rebuild of Austin Sept 2016 – June 2018
FFE & Equipment for Austin ES July 2018
Occupy New Austin ES August 2018

2014 Dist 1 ES Enrollment & Capacity
.pdf link icon Enrollment/Capacity Numbers in Oct 2014

School Enroll Capacity PctCap Portables
Ashford Park ES 574 563 102% 5
Austin ES 637 616 103% 4
Cary Reynolds ES 1163 749 155% 21
Chesnut ES 452 570 79% 3
Dresden ES 1183 850 139% 14
Dunwoody ES 979 973 101%
Hightower ES 832 635 131% 13
Huntley Hills ES 493 532 93% 3
Kingsley ES 568 500 114% 5
Kittredge ES 458 590 78%
Montclair ES 1128 792 142% 16
Montgomery ES 754 699 108% 5
Oakcliff ES 730 752 97%
Vanderlyn ES 714 576 124% 11
Woodward ES 1041 826 126% 12

Austin ES Projected Enrollment

Year Enrollment
2011 653
2012 647
2013 630
2014 637
2015 642
2016 655
2017 671
2018 678
2019 686
2020 691
2021 698

Related Documents

From Nancy Jester
The 10-Year Facility Master Plan “did not consider capacity and projected growth when SPLOST IV projects were identified,” according to Nancy Jester, former DeKalb Schools board member.  “The SPLOST process is political.  The data was made to fit the predetermined decisions in order to justify the building list.”
She goes on to say,

“The DeKalb Board of Education sent a referendum to the voters that funds building new elementary schools where we will only need 40% of the current capacity. Yet, in areas that are already at 100% and projected to need much more, DeKalb is adding very little capacity. Many communities are looking at having trailers in perpetuity. Even if some of the capacity needs were addressed in the next SPLOST, effectively a generation of children will have gone through school in trailers.
When SPLOST IV ends, DeKalb’s taxpayers will have given the school district approximately $2 billion to build and improve schools. It is unconscionable that we have so many children in trailers throughout the district. The weight of this fact was not lost on me during the SPLOST IV process while I was on the board. This is the primary reason I voted against taking this referendum to the public.”

Continue Reading Here >>

Austin Elementary Rebuild Update

Austin ElementaryAccording to the latest Capital Improvement Monthly Status Report (pg 97), The Austin ES rebuild is scheduled to begin in April 2017 and be ready for the first day of class in August 2018.
Continue reading