Author Archives: Stan Jester

Testing Dates and Religious Holidays

 Open Letter to Dr. Green From Commissioner Nancy Jester
 2015 – 2016 Testing Calendar
 2015 – 2016 School Calendar
.pdf link icon  Nancy Jester’s 2011 Email – Halloween
.doc link icon  Community Email to District
facebook  Resolve Dekalb ITBS Testing


Stan Jester
Board Of Education
District 1

I have expressed my concerns to DeKalb Schools about the testing calendar and the conflict and burden it places on our Jewish community’s most important Holy Days.  It appears the DeKalb Schools district goes through a two step process with calendar development.
The first step is to determine the actual start and stop dates for the school year and place into the calendar the various holidays, planning days, make up days and pre-planning days.  That first process appears to have a solid review process and solicits feedback.
The second step in the process is to determine testing dates within the calendar.  This second process does not appear to receive the same level of scrutiny.  Rather than vetting the testing dates through the calendar committee and the board, the DCSD’s Department of Research, Assessments, and Grants selects the testing windows and places them on the calendar.
Some of you may recall that in 2012 the school system scheduled testing for the day after Halloween.  Concerned parents lobbied the school district to reconsider the wisdom of that schedule and the district changed the testing date.  We expect school to be scheduled on Halloween, Ash Wednesday, Rosh Hashana, and Yom Kippur.  However, it is not a good idea to schedule major tests on those days.
Twice, I have asked the administration to reconsider the September and October testing dates.  Below is the latest response from Superintendent Stephen Green to my request (and Marshall Orson’s request) to change the ITBS testing dates.


Subject: Testing Dates and Religious Holidays
By: Superintendent Stephen Green

This [message] serves to provide a context of the measures the District takes to plan a school calendar and provide equitable attention, application, and solutions for accommodating students from various religious backgrounds.
In accordance with Board Policies AEA and AEA-R, the Calendar Committee convened in September 2014 to develop the 2015-2016 school calendar recommendation. The Calendar Committee was comprised of a variety of stakeholder groups from Regions I-V, including students, parents, community/business partners, school-level staff, and district-level advisors. The diverse stakeholder group represented different nationalities and faiths.
During the work sessions in September, the Calendar Committee researched and discussed the number of days per year, number of days per semester, inclement weather or emergency days, religious observances, spring holidays, testing windows, and other metro area school districts’ calendars. The committee members were divided into two work groups for the purpose of developing a minimum of two calendar options. Each group developed one calendar option and presented the draft to the full Calendar Committee to identify similarities and differences. The committee members discussed the possible impact on families and made revisions.
Also, the members decided to obtain stakeholder input through a survey/questionnaire instead of a vote. The online calendar survey opened for public feedback on October 10, 2014 and closed October 20, 2014. The total number of surveys completed was 6020. At the final official meeting on Tuesday, October 28, 2014, the members reviewed the feedback from stakeholders and made the final recommendation to the Superintendent.
Once the Board of Education approved the 2015-2016 school calendar and the Georgia Department of Education released the official 2015-2016 testing schedule, the Department of Research, Assessments, and Grants developed the District’s testing calendar. The Department of Research, Assessments, and Grants considered the religious observances identified below, feedback received from the school calendar survey, dialogue with elementary principals, and noted findings in the gifted audit report to develop the extensive yearly calendar.

The testing calendar specifies that the Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT) and Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) will be administered September 9-25, 2015. The CogAT and ITBS are standardized tests used in the gifted identification process. In an effort to identify gifted eligible students, the CogAT and ITBS will be administered in September instead of October. The score reports will arrive earlier, thereby allowing schools to continue the gifted identification process with the necessary data in a timely fashion.
Although the published time frame for the ITBS is ten days, only six days are needed to administer the ITBS and four days are allocated as make-up days. Since the testing window includes four make-up days for students who miss a component of the ITBS, a parent/guardian should communicate the absence with the local school to ensure that the child has the opportunity to make-up the missed component because of an excused religious observance. Please note that the ITBS testing window impacts students who observe Rosh Hashanah, Ganesh Chaturthi, Day of Arafat, Yom Kippur, Madon, and Eid-ul-Adha.

Five days are allocated for ITBS testing in 3rd, 5th, and 7th grades and six days for 1st grade. Schools may conduct make-up sessions on the designated days or in the afternoon immediately following the morning administration.
Dr. R. Stephen Green, Superintendent
DeKalb County School District
2015-2016 Religious Holidays (Defined by DeKalb Schools)

Date Holiday Religion
Sun-Tues. – Sept. 13-15, 2015 Rosh Hashanah Judaism
Thurs. – Sept. 17, 2015 Ganesh Chaturthi Hindu
Tues. – Sept. 22, 2015 Day of Arafat Islam
Tues. – Wed. Sept. 22-23, 2015 Yom Kippur Judaism
Wed. – Sept. 23, 2015 Madon Pagan
Wed. – Sat. Sept. 23-24, 2015 Eid-ul-Adha Islam
Sun. – Tues. Sept. 27-29, 2015 Sukkot Judaism
Wed. – Sun. Sept. 30-Oct. 4, 2015 Sukkot Judaism
Tues. – Wed. Oct. 13-21, 2015 Navrati Hinduism
Fri. – March 25, 2016 Good Friday Orthodox Christian
Sun. – March 27, 2016 Easter Orthodox Christian
Thurs. Apr. 14, 2016 Baisakhi Hindu
Thurs. Apr. 21, 2016 Ridvan Baha’i
Fri. – Sun. Apr. 25-28, 2016 Passover Judaism
Mon. – Thurs. Apr. 25-28, 2016 Passover Judaism
Thurs.- Sat. Apr. 28-30, 2016 Passover Judaism
Fri. – Apr. 29, 2016 Great Friday Orthodox Christian
Fri. – Sat. May 6-7, 2016 Lag B’Omer Judaism
Tues. May 24, 2016 Pentecost Christian


Related Links Docs

 DeKalb Schools 2015 – 2016 Testing Calendar
ITBS Testing Dates Around Atlanta

  • DeKalb: ITBS: Setp 14-25
  • Fulton: ITBS: Oct 19-23, 2015
  • Cobb: ITBS: October 5-8
  • Gwinnett: ITBS: October 19 – 28
  • APS: ITBS: November 30- December 11
  • Rockdale: ITBS Oct. 19-23, 2015

DeKalb Corruption Update

Judge Cynthia Becker

Rhonda Cook is reporting that a Cobb County grand jury indicted former DeKalb County Superior Court Judge Cynthia Becker today on charges that she lied to state investigators looking into her handling of the 2013 sentencing of DeKalb’s one-time school Superintendent Crawford Lewis.

Commissioner Elaine Boyer

“Corruption in DeKalb County is rampant” said Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Davis in federal court.  Earlier this week, Mark Niesse reported on John Boyer, the husband of former DeKalb County Commissioner Elaine Boyer, who was sentenced Wednesday to serve a year and a day in a federal prison camp for an $85,000 kickback scheme.
Mike Bowers, former Attorney General of Georgia and Richard Hyde, chief investigator for the state Judicial Qualifications Commission, wrote a letter to Lee May calling DeKalb County Government “Rotten to the Core.”

WABE

Last week, Interim CEO Lee May talked about the ongoing corruption investigation on WABE’s “A Closer Look”.  Commissioner Nancy Jester responded this week on WABE’s “A Closer Look”.
The following is an excerpt from that interview with Rose Scott and Denis O’Hayer.
Denis O’Hayer –  The interim CEO set a deadline for a week from today for the investigators, Mike Bowers and Richard Hyde, to submit the report and there’s currently no funding for it to continue beyond that. When he was here last week, he insisted that all that doesn’t necessarily mean the investigation it is suddenly going to end next week.
Recording of last week’s interview with Interim CEO Lee May,

Lee May – I know people are reading into everything, saying I’m cutting it off and I’m firing them. They’re not being cut off, they’re not being fired. The executive order said after 120 days we will get a detailed report. I’m sticking to what I said over 4 months ago.
Denis O’Hayer – So it could continue?
Lee May – There are possibilities there. I’m not saying that it will continue. I’m saying this will be the beginning of us implementing some things to protect the county.”

Denis O’Hayer – Doesn’t that give you at least some confidence that if the investigators report shows evidence of serious ongoing problems Mr May will push for the money to continue?

Commissioner Nancy Jester – I think the statements here were certainly an effort to walk back a previous tone he previously cast out there. He was strident before and now he is saying “whoa” let me back off and we’ll see what’s in the report. Let me correct one thing, Mr. Bowers and Mr. Hyde have made it perfectly clear that the deadline is October 6th.  I look forward to their report very much.
Rose Scott – Commissioner Jester, you said you thought Mr May was nervous about the probe and in your words saying “it was too close to something”, “something that he’s uncomfortable with.” Those are your exact words. Without any evidence but yet the investigators are even looking at Interim CEO May, why would you say that? Why make the charge that maybe he’s nervous or uncomfortable about something? One could argue that’s a deliberate charge that he’s doing something correct.
Nancy Jester – Again, I await all the information. But, we certainly know, it’s already come out the irregularities with fixing the plumbing at his house and the $4,000 check that remains unsolved that he said did not receive but was made payable to him by a contractor that did work for the county and later got a contract.
I don’t know if any of that will be discussed in the probe of the investigative report or if that is something that is now under consideration by law enforcement. And I don’t know where that stands. But that is not in question, that’s a fact. That’s been documented and reported on so I don’t know is that something he’s uncomfortable with? Is there something else? Are there people in the administration that he’s uncomfortable with what’s going to happen? I don’t know, I’ll leave that to him, but it makes suggestions.
Denis O’Hayer – Why hint that he’s too close to something or nervous when we haven’t even seen the report yet?
Nancy Jester – We do know about that check, that’s documented. That’s not been fully reconciled publicly. I don’t know the end result of that.
Denis O’Hayer – He said he never received that money and whoever wrote that check had nothing to do with him.  Maybe the report will sort some of that out, which brings up the question, “Why not wait for the report?”
Nancy Jester – I am waiting for the report. When a Former Attorney General and the Chief Investigator for the Judicial Qualifications Commission of the state of Georgia, two men with sterling reputations, come out and they write that letter. They are serious men, and you have to take them incredibly seriously and I do.
I though the tone of the county’s CEO, after that letter was released, was not serious enough. It did not take those allegations written by these two men very seriously and they are serious men indeed.
Rose Scott – What did you think about the tone of the letter from Mike Bowers? That was pretty charged too. He said from the top to the bottom, which could include all the Commissioners as well as Lee May. So what was your reaction to the tone of that letter?
Nancy Jester – I thought that letter needed to be taken seriously. I thought it was a serious tone. Again these men have credibility. There are people in jail right now from the Atlanta cheating scandal because of the work they did. They are serious people. I don’t think they’re prone to hyperbole. So, I don’t take them as being over the top in that letter.  I think that they are going to back up everything they wrote in that letter, because they have done that before when they have investigated things.  They’ve done a great job and I look forward to seeing that on October 6.
Listen to the complete interview here >>