Author Archives: Stan Jester

Charters Vs Failing Schools in DeKalb


Stan Jester
Board Of Education
District 1

On Monday, the school board passed the DATE charter renewal petition, but not before an interesting conversation and perspective on charters and failing schools in DeKalb.
McNair Elementary has failed children for a generation, had the lowest elementary CCRPI scores in the district in 2014 and is at the top of the Opportunity School District List.  Many parents zoned to McNair choose to send their child to the DeKalb Academy of Technology & Environment (DATE) charter school located in Stone Mountain and whose scores are an improvement over many of the other choices.
During the DATE charter board discussion,  I pointed out that charters like DATE with long waiting lists (300+ students) are indicators of things going well in DeKalb.  The waiting list is a market signal to that they are doing something right.  Demand for this school is higher than what they can handle.  People are choosing this environment for their child.  The school district should figure out what DATE is doing to attract parents to choose this school.  That would help DeKalb build a road map to improve academic achievement at poorly performing schools.
Marlon Walker is the AJC reporter that covers DeKalb Schools and wrote the following article about the ensuing board discussion.
Questions of racial bias surface at DeKalb school board meeting

By: Marlon A. Walker – The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

A school’s charter renewal prompted discussion by DeKalb County school board members on racial bias in the district …
The discussion began as the board considered the DeKalb Academy of Technology and the Environment’s application for charter renewal. Michael Erwin, who represents District 3, said it bothered him that applicants sometimes could not answer simple questions including why a charter was being sought.
“Personally, I’m more concerned about whether they’re more financially viable,” said board member Stan Jester, who represents District 1. “Are their [test] scores good? And I think the fact that there’s a 300-person waiting list tells me those parents are paying attention and they want to go into those schools. I mean, what’s the waiting list to get into McNair Elementary? It’s not 300 kids. The parents know where they want to send their kids.”

“If you’re not going to have equity and children are not treated the same and they’re not a Fernbank or somewhere else, would you be on a waiting list?” Morley said. “And we know what needs to be done. If you treat all the schools the same, make the buildings look the same, bring in the same people, give them the same kind of equipment … ”
Continue Reading at the AJC Online Here >>

Mayor Mike Davis – Austin ES Rebuild Update


Stan Jester
Board Of Education
District 1

Superintendent Green and his staff have approached the Austin rebuild situation very methodically. I asked Dr. Green and his administration to meet Dunwoody’s city representatives and work with them on a solution together.
Dunwoody Talk cracks me up.  Be sure to read Callihan’s latest take on the Austin ES rebuild.
Mayor Mike Davis sent this update on the Austin ES Rebuild this morning.

Mayor Mike Davis

Keep Austin in the Neighborhood
By: Mayor Mike Davis

The ability to walk your children to school is one of the reasons why Dunwoody is an exceptional place to live. Recent discussions have brought this issue (and others) to the forefront as the DeKalb County School District (DCSD) has been exploring the future of Austin Elementary.Walking kids to school is not the sole benefit of neighborhood schools; critical factors such as home values, quality of life and class sizes are all at stake. But keeping Austin within its immediate vicinity on Roberts Drive is obviously the leading factor for Austin families.In late September, DCSD representatives briefed Austin Council members on plans for a renovation/rebuild and a potential new location with an increased capacity to meet future growth. These plans included the possibility of locating the new facility to an undisclosed spot within a “3 mile radius” of Austin’s current home.
Upon hearing this, I decided it was time for the City of Dunwoody and in particular the mayor to have a meaningful seat at the discussion table.
I took this as a call to action and set up a meeting this past Friday with Joshua Williams, Chief Operating Officer for DCSD and Daniel Drake, Director of Planning and SPLOST Programming for DCSD. I had our senior staff and mapping people with me so we could show dynamic changes as we virtually moved the school from site to site.
Austin Elementary has a current enrollment of approximately 660 students and a maximum capacity of 616, hence the need for four portable trailers on site. After initial discussions of the current issues, we all agreed something needs to be done to address the long-term success of Austin.
Unfortunately there are challenges in front of any change. The construction of a larger school on the current site is viewed as difficult for a variety of reasons including usable acreage, high voltage power lines, high pressure petroleum pipelines, traffic patterns and playground space needs.
Contrary to neighborhood rumors, the city has never been presented with a proposal for DCSD to buy the ball fields to the south of Austin. The ball fields have deed restrictions making it difficult (but not impossible) to put a school there. This is a definite possibility and really the only option in my mind other than leaving the school on its current site.
The only green field site in Dunwoody is the field across from the MARTA station. With State Farm paying $8 million per acre across the street, that site is out of the question. Buying out a neighborhood or commercial area is too expensive also.
It’s worth noting, Mr. Williams and Mr. Drake were pleased with the ability to finally work with a city government regarding decisions affecting an almost perfect school cluster (1 high school, 1 middle school and five and a half elementary schools). In the unincorporated parts of the county it’s difficult for them to find a single person or group who actually represents an entire community’s needs and requirements.
In the end, DCSD heard us loud and clear on keeping Austin a local school. I left with the promise of returning to the discussion after DCSD has conducted its next round of legal, cost and feasibility studies to collectively determine an efficient, amenable and community-minded solution.
I went into this meeting with two primary objectives. First, keep the Austin school in the footprint of the current attendance zone, hopefully on Roberts Drive. And secondly, avoid moving the students to a temporary site for 2 years while the school is rebuilt at the current location. A major objective of the school system is to build capacity for future growth, utilization, teacher-to-student ratio and class sizes. I’m pleased with the direction our talks have taken so far.