The National School Climate Center defines school climate as “the quality and character of school life” that is based on the “patterns of students’, parents’, and school personnel’s experiences of school life.”[1] School climate can be influenced by the norms, goals, values, interpersonal relationships, instructional practices, and organizational structures within a school. Research has found that schools with positive school climates tend to have better test scores and graduation rates; in contrast, schools with negative school climates as a result of unsafe or hostile environments tend to have lower academic performance.[2]
A sustainable, positive school climate supports people feeling socially, emotionally and physically safe. In a positive school climate people are engaged and respected. By contrast, disruptive and aggressive behavior such as threats, bullying, teasing and harassment creates a hostile school environment that interferes with academic performance. A hostile school environment fosters increased absenteeism and truancy because students feel unsafe at school. If a child is not physically and mentally in attendance, learning cannot take place.
Stan Jester
What’s your analysis of this information? What do you notice?
Given the 2016 School Climate Star Ratings, it looks like generally people are content in the Chamblee, Cross Keys, Dunwoody, Druid Hills and Lakeside clusters. I still find it odd that Lakeside HS is the only school in the cluster with a below satisfactory index.
Also, Cross Keys HS knocked their CCRPI scores out of the park. DeKalb 2016 CCRPI Trends
School Climate and CCRPI for all schools by Region
REGION 1
Cluster | School Name | OSD | Title I | CCRPI | School Climate Star Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chamblee | Ashford Park ES | N | 87.5 | 3 | |
Chamblee | Huntley Hills ES | Y | 72 | 4 | |
Chamblee | Montgomery ES | N | 87.3 | 4 | |
Chamblee | Chamblee MS | N | 85.1 | 4 | |
Chamblee | Chamblee Charter HS | Y | 87.5 | 4 | |
Charter | DeKalb PATH | Y | 82.5 | 5 | |
Charter | Tapestry | N | 57.6 | 4 | |
Cross Keys | Cary Reynolds ES | Y | 66.5 | 4 | |
Cross Keys | Dresden ES | Y | 48.8 | 2 | |
Cross Keys | Montclair ES | Focus | Y | 52 | 3 |
Cross Keys | Oakcliff ES | Y | 70.2 | 4 | |
Cross Keys | Woodward ES | Y | 60.3 | 4 | |
Cross Keys | Sequoyah MS | Y | 64 | 5 | |
Cross Keys | Cross Keys HS | Priority | Y | 81.9 | 3 |
Dunwoody | Austin ES | N | 97.1 | 4 | |
Dunwoody | Chesnut ES | N | 61 | 4 | |
Dunwoody | Dunwoody ES | N | 91.6 | 4 | |
Dunwoody | Hightower ES | Y | 66.9 | 3 | |
Dunwoody | Kingsley ES | Y | 75.6 | 4 | |
Dunwoody | Vanderlyn ES | N | 93.4 | 4 | |
Dunwoody | Peachtree MS | N | 78.8 | 4 | |
Dunwoody | Dunwoody HS | N | 93.4 | 4 | |
Chamblee | Kittredge Magnet | N | 105.5 | 4 | |
No Cluster | Int’l. Student Center | Y | 27 | 5 |
REGION 2
Cluster | School Name | OSD | Title I | CCRPI | School Climate Star Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Charter | Int’l. Community School | Y | 62.9 | 3 | |
Charter | Museum School | N | 88.7 | 4 | |
Druid Hills | Avondale ES | Y | 56.1 | 3 | |
Druid Hills | Briar Vista ES | Y | 74.8 | 2 | |
Druid Hills | Fernbank ES | Y | 80.1 | 4 | |
Druid Hills | Laurel Ridge ES | Y | 89 | 3 | |
Druid Hills | McLendon ES | Y | 73.8 | 4 | |
Druid Hills | Druid Hills MS | Y | 73.8 | 4 | |
Druid Hills | Druid Hills HS | Y | 80.6 | 4 | |
Lakeside | Briarlake ES | N | 78.5 | 4 | |
Lakeside | Evansdale ES | Y | 72 | 4 | |
Lakeside | Hawthorne ES | Y | 69.2 | 5 | |
Lakeside | Henderson MS | Y | 74.8 | 5 | |
Lakeside | Oak Grove ES | N | 89.5 | 4 | |
Lakeside | Pleasantdale ES | Y | 61.3 | 3 | |
Lakeside | Sagamore Hills ES | N | 77.3 | 4 | |
Lakeside | Henderson Mill ES | Y | 78.6 | 4 | |
Lakeside | Lakeside HS | Y | 80.3 | 2 | |
No Cluster | DeKalb ES of the Arts | Y | 84.1 | 3 | |
No Cluster | Robert Shaw | Y | 78.7 | 4 | |
No Cluster | DeKalb School of the Arts | N | 100.4 | 3 | |
Tucker | Brockett ES | Y | 80.2 | 2 | |
Tucker | Idlewood ES | Y | 61.4 | 2 | |
Tucker | Livsey ES | Y | 75.8 | 3 | |
Tucker | Midvale ES | Y | 63.3 | 3 | |
Tucker | Smoke Rise ES | Focus | Y | 59.3 | 2 |
Tucker | Tucker MS | Y | 71.2 | 4 | |
Tucker | Tucker HS | Y | 78.4 | 3 |
REGION 3
Cluster | School Name | OSD | Title I | CCRPI | School Climate Star Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Charter | DeKalb Academy of Tech | N | 61.8 | 3 | |
Clarkston | Allgood ES | Focus | Y | 61.2 | 3 |
Clarkston | Dunaire ES | Y | 48.8 | 2 | |
Clarkston | Indian Creek ES | Y | 70.3 | 4 | |
Clarkston | Jolly ES | Y | 56.5 | 2 | |
Clarkston | Freedom MS | Focus & OSD | Y | 61.4 | 3 |
Clarkston | Clarkston HS | Priority | Y | 70.9 | 3 |
No Cluster | Wynbrooke ES | Y | 74.4 | 2 | |
No Cluster | The Champion Middle | Y | 70.1 | 5 | |
No Cluster | Dekalb Early College | Y | 106.5 | 5 | |
Redan | Eldridge L. Miller ES | Focus | Y | 57.6 | 2 |
Redan | Redan ES | Y | 46.7 | 3 | |
Redan | Shadow Rock ES | Y | 51.7 | 2 | |
Redan | Redan MS | Y | 63.9 | 2 | |
Redan | Redan HS | Priority | Y | 72 | 2 |
Stephenson | Pine Ridge ES | Y | 57.4 | 2 | |
Stephenson | Princeton ES | Focus | Y | 61.5 | 2 |
Stephenson | Rock Chapel ES | Y | 59.6 | 2 | |
Stephenson | Stephenson MS | Y | 63.8 | 3 | |
Stephenson | Stephenson HS | Y | 78.2 | 3 | |
Stone Mountain | Hambrick ES | Y | 57.3 | 3 | |
Stone Mountain | Rockbridge ES | Y | 55.5 | 2 | |
Stone Mountain | Stone Mill ES | Y | 65.1 | 2 | |
Stone Mountain | Stone Mountain ES | Y | 45.2 | 2 | |
Stone Mountain | Stone Mountain MS | Y | 60 | 4 | |
Stone Mountain | Stone Mountain HS | OSD | Y | 69.4 | 1 |
REGION 4
Cluster | School Name | OSD | Title I | CCRPI | School Climate Star Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Charter | DeKalb Preparatory | Y | 61.5 | 2 | |
Charter | Leadership Prep | Y | 69.1 | 2 | |
Charter | Destiny | Priority | Y | 48.4 | 3 |
Lithonia | Stoneview ES | Focus | Y | 45.8 | 1 |
Lithonia | Lithonia MS | Focus | Y | 47.1 | 1 |
Lithonia | Lithonia HS | Y | 61.9 | 2 | |
Miller Grove | Panola Way ES | Y | 42.5 | 1 | |
Miller Grove | Woodridge ES | Y | 65 | 2 | |
Miller Grove | Miller Grove MS | Y | 55.6 | 1 | |
Miller Grove | Miller Grove HS | Y | 71.8 | 2 | |
MLK | Browns Mill ES | Focus | Y | 51.8 | 3 |
MLK | Fairington ES | Y | 45.9 | 3 | |
MLK | Flat Rock ES | Y | 55.3 | 2 | |
MLK | Murphy Candler ES | Y | 52.1 | 3 | |
MLK | Salem MS | Y | 55.3 | 2 | |
MLK | MLK, Jr. HS | Y | 62.9 | 1 | |
No Cluster | Edward L. Bouie, Sr. ES | Y | 75.5 | 3 | |
No Cluster | Marbut ES | Y | 71.8 | 3 | |
No Cluster | Narvie Harris ES | Y | 72.7 | 3 | |
No Cluster | Arabia Mountain HS | Y | 93.2 | 4 | |
SW DeKalb | Bob Mathis ES | Focus | Y | 60.5 | 2 |
SW DeKalb | Chapel Hill ES | Y | 50 | 2 | |
SW DeKalb | Rainbow ES | Y | 61.2 | 2 | |
SW DeKalb | Chapel Hill MS | Y | 65.2 | 3 | |
SWDeKalb | Southwest DeKalb HS | Y | 76.9 | 3 |
REGION 5
Cluster | School Name | OSD | Title I | CCRPI | School Climate Star Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cedar Grove | Cedar Grove ES | Y | 60.5 | 2 | |
Cedar Grove | Oakview Elementary | Y | 47.7 | 1 | |
Cedar Grove | Cedar Grove MS | OSD | Y | 51.7 | 3 |
Cedar Grove | Cedar Grove HS | Y | 78.4 | 3 | |
Columbia | Columbia ES | Y | 53 | 3 | |
Columbia | Snapfinger ES | Focus | Y | 50.4 | 2 |
Columbia | Toney ES | Priority | Y | 54.3 | 3 |
Columbia | Columbia MS | Focus | Y | 59.9 | 1 |
Columbia | Columbia HS | Priority | Y | 64.7 | 1 |
McNair | Clifton ES | Focus | Y | 58.6 | 3 |
McNair | Flat Shoals ES | Y | 47.5 | 2 | |
McNair | Kelley Lake ES | Focus | Y | 68.1 | 4 |
McNair | Meadowview ES | Focus | Y | 41.5 | 2 |
McNair | McNair Discovery | Focus | Y | 53.6 | 2 |
McNair | McNair MS | OSD | Y | 52 | 3 |
McNair | McNair HS | Priority | Y | 58.2 | 1 |
No Cluster | Wadsworth Magnet | Y | 99.6 | 3 | |
No Cluster | DeKalb Alternative | Y | 42.4 | 1 | |
No Cluster | Elizabeth Andrews HS | Y | 56.5 | 4 | |
Towers | Canby Lane ES | Focus | Y | 57.1 | 2 |
Towers | Rowland ES | Y | 54.9 | 2 | |
Towers | Bethune MS | Focus | Y | 54.9 | 2 |
Towers | Towers HS | Priority | Y | 57.2 | 1 |
Charter | GLOBE | 84.1 | 4 | ||
Towers | Peachcrest ES | 44.1 | 2 |
[2] Thapa, Amrit, Jonathan Cohen, Shawn Guffey, and Ann Higgins-D’Alessandro. 2013. “A Review of School Climate Research.” Review of Educational Research 83(3): 357-385.
Two factors that could have possibly led to the lower score are the size of the school and the removal and replacement of the principal.
So Montclair and Dresden at 2 and 3 on climate. Cross Keys at a 3 on climate. Montclair, Dresden, Seqoyah, and Cary Reynolds under 67 in CCrPI scores. Tell me again how these schools don’t have their own specific needs that should be addressed? This population will get lost in these mega schools.
Cross Keys cluster sure does have a high climate rating for such a neglected and downtrodden community. Lithonia and Miller Grove are the communities that should be asking to be dismantled.
Stan: Check you “contact us” email – I just sent you something I noticed just a few minutes ago. Not trying to be secretive just don’t want to stir stuff up if it’s not what I think it is.
I know I’ve been wrong before!
Nobody respond to that. I know what you think.
And I was wise to not go all “breaking news.” Nothing really there. Surprise.
But I was wondering Stan – from up here in the North it seems there are so many squeaky wheels that get organized in regions 1 & 2 – myself included, when overall things are pretty good. But look to the South – ouch. Which we generally know. Even when there is an structured opportunity to give input in general there is mostly silence. At least that’s how it seems.
Is that generally true? I know not your regions but do fellow board members from the south share concerns from their regions driven by parents that motivate their actions? Or do they fill the voids?
From where I sit, Regions 1 & 2 aren’t very squeaky at all. South DeKalb has numerous groups from the NAACP to DeKalb Strong that are very “squeaky”.
You alluded to the “room for improvement” and “opportunities for success” in South DeKalb (phrases like “abject failure” are frowned upon). As the president of the NAACP, John Evans would spend a lot of time advocating for jobs as a way to help the economic wasteland that is South DeKalb.
I believe improving academic achievement will be the biggest boost to economic development in DeKalb. Dr. Green improved academic achievement in Kansas City, Missouri. I wanted him to be here to do the same in DeKalb. When he got here, I had very few instructions for him. The first two were
#1 – Stay out of jail
#2 – Get our schools off the OSD list
While we don’t have OSD anymore, the CCRPI indicators are still there. I have given Dr. Green considerable latitude to make that happen.
I was talking more grass roots – parents getting organized – wearing matching t-shirts, getting on the news – all that. Talking their way into drawing lines. Going back years under Lewis when closings & redistricting were on the table, I’m sure that the Southern board members were bringing it, but few Southern parents showed up at board meetings or public comment things.
The groups like the NAACP – that’s never going away, I think some here might be surprised what this “liberal” thinks on that topic. But families, communities, getting organized – my point was it tends to be those already “doing OK if not better”- meanwhile those that often need it this most are not as engaged in the process, and that goes for some schools in the North – like the CK ESs.
So maybe families in the South w/1s & 2s are raising hell & I’m not hearing it. Obviously this is basically a “Northern” site, but even on DWS & DWS2 the discussions mainly revolved around the north. The South got brought up mainly in the context of evaluating the quality/competency of their board members – and rightfully so.
Some of those board meeting were so crazy it was like a comedy skit or prank show – but the jokes were real – and mostly on us. I’ll never forget – “No – I haven’t read it, and can’t now, I forgot my glasses!”
I must have missed something. Unless there was a holiday, I thought that BOE Meetings were held on the 1st Monday of each month. From the dates listed it looks liked it changed? Why?
As always thank you for providing a way to ask questions and get information.
The Superintendent asked if we could break from that a little so that we could have 4 to 5 weeks between each board meeting. 2017 DeKalb Board of Education MEETING SCHEDULE. If a meeting got pushed back for a holiday, then sometimes there was only 3 weeks until the next board meeting. It’s still generally the first Monday with a few more exceptions.
Thank you.
Each school will receive a 1-5 star rating, with five stars representing an excellent school climate, and one star representing a school climate most in need of improvement. Schools will have access to a comprehensive report which will allow them to identify areas in need of improvement, and plan targeted student interventions to improve achievement for all students.